FlyingPress vs WP Rocket: which is the best WordPress caching plugin in 2025?
Introduction
FlyingPress is simpler to configure, faster by default and excels on Core Web Vitals. WP Rocket offers more advanced settings and compatibility, especially with the database. The choice depends on your priorities: ease or control.
Looking for the best WordPress optimization plugin to speed up your site? The FlyingPress vs WP Rocket comparison comes up often. These two premium caching plugins dominate the market in terms of speed, ease of use and Core Web Vitals. So, which plugin should you choose between FlyingPress and WP Rocket?
FlyingPress is a complete solution: page caching, delay JavaScript, image optimization, remove unused CSS, CDN integration via FlyingCDN… All in a modern, intuitive interface that’s easy to use, even without technical skills.
WP Rocket remains a recognized caching plugin, compatible with all hosting providers, including SiteGround Optimizer, and boasting over 1.5 million installations. Its features include database optimization, GZIP compression, lazy loading and a 100% translated interface.
So, is FlyingPress better than WP Rocket? What are their respective advantages, their prices, and how can these plugins improve the speed of your WordPress site? Here’s our flyingpress review.
Key features: FlyingPress and WP Rocket put to the test
Optimized loading and Core Web Vitals
FlyingPress and WP Rocket incorporate similar techniques:
- Minification of CSS and JavaScript files
- Preloading of links and pages
- Delayed loading of scripts(delay JS) and media(lazy load)
- Google Fonts management and critical CSS generation
FlyingPress goes one step further with :
- Remove unused CSS (based on actual usage)
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) and Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) optimization
- Intelligent preloading based on page popularity
Advanced caching
Both offer page caching with options forexclusion, cache preloading and CDN compatibility.
But FlyingPress :
- avoids global cache purging (saves resources)
- is compatible with Cloudflare APO and HTTP/3
WP Rocket stands out for its stability and perfect interoperability with plugins such as WooCommerce, Elementor and Perfmatters.
Image optimization
Both plugins include :
- Lazy loading of images, iframes, videos
- WebP and compression support
- Conditional loading above the fold
FlyingPress also offers :
- Replace YouTube videos with local thumbnails
- Localization of remote images for faster loading
- Automatic adaptation to screen resolution
Database, scripts and compatibility
WP Rocket features a native database optimization module. (cleaning up revisions, tables and comments).
FlyingPress focuses more on the front-end, without database management, but remains compatible with object cache or Redis.
Interface and configuration
FlyingPress and WP Rocket are both designed for a smooth user experience:
- Quick setup with minimal configuration
- Modern interfaces and ease of use
- Compatibility with all major hosting providers, themes and plugins
However :
- FlyingPress is in English only
- WP Rocket offers a French interface with a localized knowledge base
Pricing: how much does it cost?
| Plugin | Annual price (1 site) | Free version? | Refund |
|---|---|---|---|
| FlyingPress | $49 ($42 renewal) | ❌ No free version | ✅ 14 days |
| WP Rocket | 59 $ | ❌ No free version | ✅ 14 days |
➡️ FlyingPress is cheaper on a long-term subscription basis, but WP Rocket offers more advanced settings natively.
Pros and cons : FlyingPress vs. WP Rocket
✅ Advantages of FlyingPress
- More modern and fluid
- Very strong on Core Web Vitals and image optimization
- lighter than cache plugins such as W3 Total Cache or Litespeed Cache
- Very good value for money, with features like lazy load, preload, critical CSS, no addons required
- Compatible with FlyingCDN and Cloudflare Enterprise
❌ Disadvantages of FlyingPress
- No database optimization
- No free version
- Less French documentation
- Feweradvanced options than WP Rocket or Total Cache
✅ WP Rocket highlights
- French interface
- Moretechnical options (database, fine exclusion, multisite compatibility)
- Large community and localized support
- Better compatibility with certain manufacturers
❌ WP Rocket’s limitations
- Less effective on Core Web Vitals in some cases
- More advanced configuration required for optimal results
- Slightly more expensive
Plugins similar to FlyingPress or WP Rocket
If you are looking for a free or lightweight alternative to these two leaders, here are some other popular plugins:
- Litespeed Cache (ideal with Litespeed host, complete but complex)
- W3 Total Cache (highly configurable, but not very intuitive)
- Cache Enabler (lightweight, efficient, but minimalist)
- SiteGround Optimizer (excellent with SiteGround, but not universal)
- NitroPack (SaaS solution, very efficient, but not free – see also Nitropack vs. WP Rocket)
FAQ: everything you ever wondered about FlyingPress vs WP Rocket
Which plugin is faster, FlyingPress or WP Rocket?
FlyingPress is often faster in its default configuration, particularly on Core Web Vitals such as LCP or CLS. WP Rocket, on the other hand, can achieve equivalent performance if configured correctly.
Is FlyingPress better than WP Rocket?
It depends on your needs: FlyingPress stands out for its simplicity and immediate effectiveness, while WP Rocket offers more technical options for advanced users.
Does FlyingPress offer a free version?
No. FlyingPress is only available as a paid version, starting at $49/year. There is no free version, unlike Litespeed Cache or Cache Enabler.
Is WP Rocket more comprehensive?
Yes, especially when it comes to advanced features such as databases, granular file exclusion, and multisite compatibility. FlyingPress, on the other hand, focuses on the essentials.
Puis-je tester ces plugins avant achat ?
Both offer a 14-day money-back guarantee, allowing you to try them risk-free.
Who are the free competitors?
The main free alternatives are: Litespeed Cache, W3 Total Cache, Cache Enabler, and SiteGround Optimizer. They often require more manual configuration.
Can FlyingPress and WP Rocket be used together?
No. These plugins perform the same functions (caching, optimization), and using them together would create technical conflicts. You must choose only one.
Conclusion: should you choose FlyingPress or WP Rocket?
If you’re looking for a fast, powerful and easy-to-configure plugin to improve the speed of your WordPress site, FlyingPress is a more modern solution, with excellent Core Web Vitals optimization and an excellent compromise between functionality and lightness.
If you’re an advanced user or want a plugin that’s ultra-compatible with a wide range of sites, WP Rocket offers more flexibility,advanced options and better French-language support.
Our verdict: FlyingPress is the best choice for those who want to boost their WordPress site quickly, without getting lost in settings, and with an excellent performance/price ratio.
Still not sure? Take advantage of their 14-day refund period to test this plugin on your site.
✅ Optimize your WordPress now with FlyingPress or WP Rocket, two of the best caching plugins on the market.
